Training critical thinkers in virtual environments: Challenges to autonomy in three universities in Peru, Panama, and the Dominican Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35622/Keywords:
critical thinking, formative assessment, higher education, online learning, self-learningAbstract
In virtual education, student autonomy manifests as operational self-regulation, and critical thinking depends on isolated pedagogical practices, which highlights the need to analyze the pedagogical, technological, and institutional mediations that shape critical autonomy. The objective was to analyze how the formation of critical subjects and autonomy in higher-education virtual environments is configured, based on students’ experiences at three universities in Peru, Panama, and the Dominican Republic. A qualitative approach was adopted, using a multiple and comparative case study design. The purposive and voluntary sample consisted of 18 university students aged 18 to 25, evenly distributed between semi-structured interviews and focus groups, and content analysis of the institutional virtual platform was conducted in each context. The findings show that, across the three cases, operational autonomy predominates, centered on time management and task completion. Critical thinking emerges through debates and real-world cases, although with varying depth, with a technical emphasis in the Peru case, an argumentative emphasis in the Panama case, and a systematic emphasis in the Dominican Republic case. The platforms prioritize administrative functions, which limits reflection. Connectivity and economic inequalities affect all cases, with less impact in the Dominican Republic due to its support policies. It is concluded that the formation of critical subjects in virtual environments is not an automatic result of digitization, but rather depends on pedagogical mediations, institutional decisions, and specific social contexts.
References
Akinlar, A., Uğurel Kamişli, M., Yildiz, H. S., & Bozkurt, A. (2023). Bridging the digital divide in migrant education during the COVID-19 era through the lenses of critical pedagogy and inclusive education. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (36), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.36.1646
Alcívar Fajardo, O. D., Garcés Suárez, E. F., & Garcés Suárez, E. M. (2022). Interacción y participación en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje: una mirada comprensiva desde la práctica. Universidad y Sociedad, 14(6), 256–265. https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/3373
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2001). La reproducción: Elementos para una teoría del sistema de enseñanza (2ª ed.). Editorial Laia.
Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., Coëtlogon, P. de, & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572
Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/aere.2025.01.001
Cipriani, A., Bastos Stringari, F., & Selpa Heinzle, M. R. (2024). Digital technologies and Brazilian higher education: pedagogical mediation in the pandemic scenario. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 18(2), e1599. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.2024.1599
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2020). La educación en tiempos de la pandemia de COVID-19. CEPAL. https://cutt.ly/EtnC4iGr
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Panorama social de América Latina y el Caribe 2022: La transformación de la educación como base para el desarrollo sostenible. CEPAL https://cutt.ly/UtnVLYwG
Del Carpio Ramos, H. A., Del Carpio Ramos, P., García-Peñalvo, F., & Del Carpio, S. (2021). Validez de instrumento: percepción del aprendizaje virtual durante la COVID-19. Campus Virtuales, 10(2), 111-125. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8053698
Díaz-Bravo, L., Torruco-García, U., Martínez-Hernández, M., & Varela-Ruiz, M. (2013). La entrevista, recurso flexible y dinámico. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(7), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72706-6
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido (2ª ed.). Tierra Nueva.
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell Almuzara, A., Abella García, V., & Grande de Prado, M. (2020). La evaluación online en la educación superior en tiempos de la COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. In Michael Grahame Moore & William G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 113–127). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://hdl.handle.net/2149/764
Ghanbaripour, A. N., Talebian, N., Miller, D., Tumpa, R. J., Zhang, W., Golmoradi, M., & Skitmore, M. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of emerging technologies on student learning, engagement, and employability in built environment education. Buildings, 14(9), 2769. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092769
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192
Giroux, H. A. (2004). Teoría y resistencia en educación: Una pedagogía para la oposición (6ª ed.). Siglo XXI.
Giroux, H. A. (2022). Pedagogy of resistance: Against manufactured ignorance (1ª ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza Torres, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta (1ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Izcara Palacios, S. (2014). Manual de investigación cualitativa (1ª ed.). Fontamara.
Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2ª ed.). Routledge.
Lima, W. de S. (2018). Autonomia, comunicação online e colaboração nos espaços virtuais: uma análise sobre a percepção dos estudantes. Revista E-Curriculum, 16(3), 807–830. https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-3876.2018v16i3p807-830
Macedo, D. (2018). Literacies of power: What Americans are not allowed to know (1ª ed.). Routledge.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning (1ª ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Munck, R., Hodges, R. A., & Bartch, C. (2023). Higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean: Civic engagement and the democratic mission. OUI-IOHE.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). La educación en tiempos de la pandemia de COVID-19. UNESCO. https://cutt.ly/ltnC7o9f
Prado, J. F. (2021). La educación de adultos: Un acercamiento desde el aprendizaje transformacional. Conrado, 17(78), 140–144. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/1655
Rodrigues Telles-Almeida, J. G. (2021). José Martí, Paulo Freire y Hugo Zemelman: La tecnología desde una educación emancipadora. Revista Colombiana de Educación, (81), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num81-10924
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, V. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Salinas-Ibáñez, J. (2004). Entornos virtuales y formación flexible. Revista Tecnología en Marcha, 17(3), 69–80. https://revistas.tec.ac.cr/index.php/tec_marcha/article/view/1446
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide (1ª ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634876
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (1ª ed.). Continuum.
Surawy-Stepney, N., Provost, F., Bhangu, S., & Caduff, C. (2023). Introduction to qualitative research methods: Part 2. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 14(2), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_37_23
Villoria Nolla, M., & Mendoza Barroso, E. (2023). La autonomía del aprendizaje como factor clave del proceso de construcción del conocimiento. EduSol, 23(83), 180–192. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9538136
Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julio Jiménez, Melucipa Moreno, Ceferina Cabrera Félix (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
